I recently read an article claiming that Christianity in Britain, long declared dead by cultural elites, is showing signs of life again. Predictably, the reaction from skeptics was immediate. They dismissed it as interpretation, exaggeration, or wishful thinking. They demanded data, charts, and proof that fits their definition of reality.
But that response revealed something important. It exposed how narrow our culture’s understanding of truth has become, especially when it comes to faith.
Christian Revival does not announce itself the way the modern world expects. It never has. And if we insist on measuring spiritual reality using only secular tools, we will always miss what God is actually doing.
Featured Snippet Takeaway
Christian Revival is not defined by mass approval or perfect statistics. It begins when truth is spoken boldly again, when people hunger for meaning, and when faith grows stronger under pressure rather than disappearing.
For decades, Britain has been held up as a cautionary tale. Once deeply shaped by Christianity, it became one of the most secular nations in the West. Church attendance collapsed. Biblical literacy faded. Historic churches were emptied, repurposed, or abandoned. Many declared the experiment over.
Christianity, they said, had lost.
And yet, something has shifted. Not everywhere. Not evenly. Not in ways that satisfy the world’s demand for spectacle. But quietly, persistently, and unmistakably, there are signs that the story is not finished, as highlighted in a report by CBN News on the signs of revival in Britain.

The Problem With the World’s Definition of Truth
One of the most common objections I hear is that claims of revival are subjective. People say they are stories, not facts. Feelings, not evidence. Interpretation, not reality.
But that objection only makes sense if truth is limited to what can be measured.
Modern secular culture treats numbers as neutral and meaning as suspect. If something cannot be graphed, quantified, or peer reviewed, it is treated as unreliable. That standard is not applied consistently, but it is applied aggressively to Christianity.
Hostility toward biblical teaching is dismissed as anecdotal. Self censorship among believers is waved away as paranoia. Cultural resistance to Scripture is reframed as progress, a pattern I have addressed directly in my writing on Christianity and cancel culture and how believers should respond.
At the same time, emotional harm, personal offense, and ideological claims are accepted instantly when they support the dominant moral narrative.
This is not a neutral standard. It is a selective one.
Truth has never been limited to statistics. You cannot measure courage. You cannot chart repentance. You cannot quantify conviction. And yet those things shape history far more than numbers ever have.
Scripture does not tell us to watch for revival by counting heads. It tells us to watch hearts.
Hostility Does Not Disprove Faith, It Confirms Its Power
One of the clearest signs that Christianity is not dead is how aggressively it is opposed.
If biblical teaching were truly irrelevant, it would be ignored. No one campaigns against ideas that pose no threat. No one works this hard to silence beliefs that have no influence.
Yet today, Scripture itself is increasingly treated as dangerous. Passages are labeled hate speech. Core Christian convictions are portrayed as harmful. Believers are pressured to stay quiet, not because they are violent or abusive, but because they refuse to conform. This trend is especially visible in Europe, which is why I have warned that biblical hate speech laws in Europe should concern American Christians.
This hostility is not imagined. It is cultural, institutional, and increasingly normalized.
Christians are expected to retreat into private spaces, to believe quietly, and to surrender any public expression of truth that conflicts with modern moral priorities. That pressure exists in Britain. It exists here in the United States. And it is growing.
But this is not new.
Jesus told His followers that the world would hate them because it hated Him first. He did not say hostility might come. He said it would.
The mistake we make is assuming that opposition means failure. Biblically, it often means the opposite.
Revival Begins With Hunger, Not Headlines
When people imagine revival, they often picture packed stadiums and viral moments. They expect instant transformation and overwhelming consensus. When that does not happen, they conclude nothing is happening at all.
That expectation is not biblical.
Throughout Scripture, God’s movements begin quietly. A remnant returns. A prophet speaks. A people repent. Momentum builds slowly, often in the margins, often under pressure.
What we are seeing now is not a cultural takeover. It is a reawakening of hunger.
Young people are searching for meaning in a world that promised fulfillment and delivered anxiety. Men are returning to church after years of disengagement. People raised without faith are asking deeper questions because shallow answers are no longer working.
This does not show up clearly in census data. It shows up in conversations, choices, and courage.
Revival does not begin when the culture approves. It begins when truth is no longer negotiable.
Christianity Has Been Declared Dead Before
There is a pattern here that history makes impossible to ignore.
The Roman Empire believed it crushed Christianity. The Enlightenment believed reason replaced it. Modern secularism believed science and progress made it obsolete.
Every generation has its version of the same claim. This time is different. Faith is finished. The church is irrelevant.
And every time, Christianity outlives the obituary.
Not because Christians are powerful, but because Christ is faithful.
What survives is not cultural Christianity. Not social convenience. Not institutional comfort. What survives is belief rooted in truth, refined by opposition, and strengthened by conviction.
If anything, the thinning of cultural Christianity has clarified the real thing.
Why Revival Looks Invisible to Secular Eyes
The modern world is trained to recognize only certain kinds of change. It notices movements that align with its values and ignores those that challenge them.
A Christian awakening does not flatter secular assumptions. It does not celebrate self expression as ultimate. It does not affirm moral autonomy. It calls people to repentance, humility, and submission to God.
That makes it uncomfortable. So it is reframed as regression, extremism, or fantasy.
But spiritual reality does not require cultural permission.
The same voices that once declared Christianity dead now struggle to explain why it refuses to disappear. They ask for proof while ignoring the evidence that does not fit their framework.
This is not a failure of faith. It is a failure of perception.
Christian Revival Is Refined, Not Rebranded
What encourages me most is not nostalgia for the past. It is clarity about the present.
This is not a return to shallow belief or social conformity. It is a return to substance.
People who come to faith today do so knowing it will cost them something. That alone separates this moment from cultural Christianity of previous generations.
When belief carries consequences, it becomes serious. When truth is contested, it is either abandoned or embraced fully.
That is how faith grows stronger, not weaker.
Revival does not mean everyone agrees. It means some people refuse to lie.
The Question We Should Be Asking
The real question is not whether Christianity meets the world’s standard of evidence. The question is whether the world’s standard is capable of recognizing spiritual truth at all.
If revival must be approved by pollsters to be real, then the early church was a failure. If faith must be popular to matter, then Jesus chose the wrong path entirely.
But history tells a different story.
Christianity does not advance by consensus. It advances by conviction.
And conviction is returning.
Quietly. Unevenly. Imperfectly.
But undeniably.
Arch Kennedy
Bold, Unfiltered, and Unafraid
Watch my full commentary below:
Supreme Court Weighs Transgender Athletes in Women’s Sports
Leave a Reply